SCMP

As Europe rearms, can it decouple its military supply chains from China?

netral
⏎ Words Summary from News
**Europe’s rearmament drive will reduce reliance on China gradually through de-risking rather than full decoupling**, according to analysts tracking the continent’s supply chain vulnerabilities. The G7 summit declaration in Evian-les-Bains committed to cutting dependency on a single outside supplier for rare earths and permanent magnets to below 60% by 2030, with an ultimate goal of 50%. China currently supplies over 90% of global rare earths and critical minerals like gallium, which are essential for advanced military systems including radars and missile guidance. The EU’s ReArm Europe Plan, proposing over €800 billion in defence spending, underscores the urgency of this shift amid the war in Ukraine.</p><p class="summary-lead">**Europe’s dependence on China extends to drone parts, where Beijing controls over 80% of global supply**, and to cotton linters used for artillery propellant, where reliance exceeds 70%. The EU’s RESourceEU Action Plan mobilizes up to €3 billion to secure critical raw materials through domestic production and partnerships with like-minded nations. This push for localization was evident at the Eurosatory defence exhibition, where European companies attended in record numbers and joint ventures—such as Thales partnering with Poland’s Mesko and South Korea’s Hanwha—focused on on-site production. A Hanwha official noted that European nations are demanding local manufacturing, not just imports, to ensure coexistence and supply chain resilience.</p><p class="summary-lead">**Full decoupling from China is unrealistic in the short term due to cost pressures and industrial gaps**, making selective decoupling and resilience the prevailing strategy. Analysts from King’s College London and the Hudson Institute highlight that Europe will prioritize internal Europeanization through joint procurement and trusted partners like the US and South Korea, which together supplied the bulk of arms to European NATO states from 2021 to 2025. The war in Ukraine has already severed most Russian-linked supply chains, but China’s role in microelectronics, rare earths, and dual-use technologies requires a more measured approach. Diversification efforts are expanding to include Canada, Australia, and other stable resource providers, while the EU and NATO aim to avoid strategic vulnerability by tightening control over critical supply chains.</p><p class="summary-lead">**What to watch next:** Monitor the EU’s progress on the RESourceEU Action Plan and whether joint ventures at exhibitions like Eurosatory translate into actual production capacity, as well as any G7 follow-up on critical mineral targets.
Key Takeaways
  1. Europe will de-risk rather than fully decouple from China’s defence supply chains due to cost and industrial constraints.
  2. The G7 aims to cut rare earth dependency on a single outside supplier to below 60% by 2030, targeting 50% as soon as possible.
  3. China dominates over 90% of global rare earth supply and 80% of drone parts, creating acute vulnerabilities for European rearmament.
  4. Localization and joint ventures with trusted partners like South Korea and the US are central to Europe’s supply chain strategy.
Insights & Analysis
  • The shift from decoupling to de-risking signals a pragmatic recognition that China’s processing dominance cannot be quickly replaced, forcing Europe to prioritize resilience over independence.
  • Europe’s defence industrial base may become more fragmented as nations pursue bilateral localization deals, potentially complicating EU-wide standardization and interoperability.
Key Takeaways
Insights
Teks Asli (SEO)